{"id":7683,"date":"2026-09-28T10:08:10","date_gmt":"2026-09-28T08:08:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dacktest.eu\/mag\/tire-rack-dacktest-2026-215-55-r17-vredestein-quatrac\/"},"modified":"2026-09-28T10:08:10","modified_gmt":"2026-09-28T08:08:10","slug":"tire-rack-dacktest-2026-215-55-r17-vredestein-quatrac","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dacktest.eu\/mag\/tire-rack-dacktest-2026-215-55-r17-vredestein-quatrac\/","title":{"rendered":"Tire Rack d\u00e4cktest 2026: 215\/55 R17 \u2014 Vredestein Quatrac"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Tire Rack j\u00e4mf\u00f6rde 10 d\u00e4ck i dimensionen 215\/55 R17.<\/p>\n<p>Toyota Camry \u00b7 215\/55 R17<\/p>\n<p>Den ursprungliga j\u00e4mf\u00f6relsen omfattar flera d\u00e4ckkategorier. Kategorierna har separata resultatsidor.<\/p>\n<p>Hel\u00e5rsgruppen omfattar b\u00e5de hel\u00e5rsd\u00e4ck med m\u00e4rkning f\u00f6r sv\u00e5ra sn\u00f6f\u00f6rh\u00e5llanden och konventionella hel\u00e5rsd\u00e4ck.<\/p>\n<h2>Resultat \u2014 \u00e5ret runt-d\u00e4ck<\/h2>\n<p>Placeringarna och procenttalen f\u00f6ljer Tyre Reviews resultattabell, d\u00e4r de ursprungliga m\u00e4tv\u00e4rdena viktas enligt en egen metod.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Vredestein Quatrac<\/strong> \u2014 93.9% Tyre Reviews viktade po\u00e4ng\n<p>Vredestein Quatrac ligger p\u00e5 plats 1 av 5 i den h\u00e4r resultatlistan. Dess viktade po\u00e4ng i resultattabellen \u00e4r 93.9%.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>H\u00f6gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: v\u00e5tt v\u00e4glag (100.0%).<\/li>\n<li>L\u00e4gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: is (81.5%).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Michelin CrossClimate 2 A\/W<\/strong> \u2014 92.0% Tyre Reviews viktade po\u00e4ng\n<p>Michelin CrossClimate 2 A\/W ligger p\u00e5 plats 2 av 5 i den h\u00e4r resultatlistan. Dess viktade po\u00e4ng i resultattabellen \u00e4r 92.0%.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>H\u00f6gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: torrt v\u00e4glag (100.0%).<\/li>\n<li>L\u00e4gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: is (77.7%).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Michelin Primacy Tour AS<\/strong> \u2014 89.9% Tyre Reviews viktade po\u00e4ng\n<p>Michelin Primacy Tour AS ligger p\u00e5 plats 3 av 5 i den h\u00e4r resultatlistan. Dess viktade po\u00e4ng i resultattabellen \u00e4r 89.9%.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>H\u00f6gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: torrt v\u00e4glag (99.1%).<\/li>\n<li>L\u00e4gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: is (73.8%).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Bridgestone WeatherPeak<\/strong> \u2014 86.3% Tyre Reviews viktade po\u00e4ng\n<p>Bridgestone WeatherPeak ligger p\u00e5 plats 4 av 5 i den h\u00e4r resultatlistan. Dess viktade po\u00e4ng i resultattabellen \u00e4r 86.3%.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>H\u00f6gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: sn\u00f6 (92.2%).<\/li>\n<li>L\u00e4gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: is (76.4%).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Michelin Defender 2<\/strong> \u2014 85.6% Tyre Reviews viktade po\u00e4ng\n<p>Michelin Defender 2 ligger p\u00e5 plats 5 av 5 i den h\u00e4r resultatlistan. Dess viktade po\u00e4ng i resultattabellen \u00e4r 85.6%.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>H\u00f6gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: komfort (96.9%).<\/li>\n<li>L\u00e4gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: sn\u00f6 (74.3%).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h2>Resultat \u2014 vinterd\u00e4ck<\/h2>\n<p>Det f\u00f6rsta d\u00e4cket \u00e4r redaktionens vinnare. \u00d6vriga placeringar f\u00f6ljer Tyre Reviews viktade resultattabell.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Continental VikingContact 8<\/strong> \u2014 86.1% Tyre Reviews viktade po\u00e4ng\n<p>Continental VikingContact 8 ligger p\u00e5 plats 1 av 5 i den h\u00e4r resultatlistan. Dess viktade po\u00e4ng i resultattabellen \u00e4r 86.1%.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>H\u00f6gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: komfort (98.4%).<\/li>\n<li>L\u00e4gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: v\u00e5tt v\u00e4glag (79.0%).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Vredestein Wintrac Pro+<\/strong> \u2014 90.6% Tyre Reviews viktade po\u00e4ng\n<p>Vredestein Wintrac Pro+ ligger p\u00e5 plats 2 av 5 i den h\u00e4r resultatlistan. Dess viktade po\u00e4ng i resultattabellen \u00e4r 90.6%.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>H\u00f6gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: v\u00e5tt v\u00e4glag (92.8%).<\/li>\n<li>L\u00e4gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: is (78.1%).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Bridgestone Blizzak WS90<\/strong> \u2014 88.5% Tyre Reviews viktade po\u00e4ng\n<p>Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 ligger p\u00e5 plats 3 av 5 i den h\u00e4r resultatlistan. Dess viktade po\u00e4ng i resultattabellen \u00e4r 88.5%.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>H\u00f6gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: is (100.0%).<\/li>\n<li>L\u00e4gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: v\u00e5tt v\u00e4glag (79.1%).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Michelin X-Ice Snow<\/strong> \u2014 83.0% Tyre Reviews viktade po\u00e4ng\n<p>Michelin X-Ice Snow ligger p\u00e5 plats 4 av 5 i den h\u00e4r resultatlistan. Dess viktade po\u00e4ng i resultattabellen \u00e4r 83.0%.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>H\u00f6gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: sn\u00f6 (99.1%).<\/li>\n<li>L\u00e4gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: v\u00e5tt v\u00e4glag (72.2%).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>General Altimax Arctic 12<\/strong> \u2014 82.8% Tyre Reviews viktade po\u00e4ng\n<p>General Altimax Arctic 12 ligger p\u00e5 plats 5 av 5 i den h\u00e4r resultatlistan. Dess viktade po\u00e4ng i resultattabellen \u00e4r 82.8%.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>H\u00f6gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: komfort (93.8%).<\/li>\n<li>L\u00e4gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: v\u00e5tt v\u00e4glag (76.1%).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Originaltestet inneh\u00e5ller m\u00e4tv\u00e4rdena och en fullst\u00e4ndig metodbeskrivning.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.tirerack.com\/tires\/tests\/testDisplay.jsp?ttid=353\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Originaltest<\/a><\/p>\n<p><small>HJUdall \/ Wikimedia Commons (CC0) \u00b7 https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:25_Toyota_Camry_SE.jpg<\/small><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tire Rack j\u00e4mf\u00f6rde 10 d\u00e4ck i dimensionen 215\/55 R17.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7652,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7683","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dacktest.eu\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7683","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dacktest.eu\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dacktest.eu\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dacktest.eu\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dacktest.eu\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7683"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.dacktest.eu\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7683\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dacktest.eu\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7652"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dacktest.eu\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7683"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dacktest.eu\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7683"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dacktest.eu\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7683"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}