{"id":7908,"date":"2026-09-28T10:08:10","date_gmt":"2026-09-28T08:08:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dacktest.eu\/mag\/top-tire-review-dacktest-2026-225-45-r18-michelin-pilot-sport-5\/"},"modified":"2026-09-28T10:08:10","modified_gmt":"2026-09-28T08:08:10","slug":"top-tire-review-dacktest-2026-225-45-r18-michelin-pilot-sport-5","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dacktest.eu\/mag\/top-tire-review-dacktest-2026-225-45-r18-michelin-pilot-sport-5\/","title":{"rendered":"Top Tire Review d\u00e4cktest 2026: 225\/45 R18 \u2014 Michelin Pilot Sport 5"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Top Tire Review j\u00e4mf\u00f6rde 7 d\u00e4ck i dimensionen 225\/45 R18.<\/p>\n<p>BMW 3 Series \u00b7 225\/45 R18<\/p>\n<h2>Resultat \u2014 sommard\u00e4ck<\/h2>\n<p>Placeringarna f\u00f6ljer utgivarens ursprungliga klassificering. Procenttalen viktas separat av Tyre Reviews och kan skilja sig fr\u00e5n utgivarens po\u00e4ng.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Michelin Pilot Sport 5<\/strong> \u2014 98.0% Tyre Reviews viktade po\u00e4ng\n<p>Michelin Pilot Sport 5 ligger p\u00e5 plats 1 av 7 i den h\u00e4r resultatlistan. Dess viktade po\u00e4ng i resultattabellen \u00e4r 98.0%.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>H\u00f6gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: komfort (100.0%).<\/li>\n<li>L\u00e4gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: prisv\u00e4rdhet (91.8%).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Giti GitiSport S2+<\/strong> \u2014 97.1% Tyre Reviews viktade po\u00e4ng\n<p>Giti GitiSport S2+ ligger p\u00e5 plats 2 av 7 i den h\u00e4r resultatlistan. Dess viktade po\u00e4ng i resultattabellen \u00e4r 97.1%.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>H\u00f6gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: v\u00e5tt v\u00e4glag (97.9%).<\/li>\n<li>L\u00e4gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: prisv\u00e4rdhet (92.9%).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2<\/strong> \u2014 96.0% Tyre Reviews viktade po\u00e4ng\n<p>Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 ligger p\u00e5 plats 3 av 7 i den h\u00e4r resultatlistan. Dess viktade po\u00e4ng i resultattabellen \u00e4r 96.0%.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>H\u00f6gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: prisv\u00e4rdhet (100.0%).<\/li>\n<li>L\u00e4gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: torrt v\u00e4glag (95.3%).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Continental MaxContact MC7<\/strong> \u2014 95.4% Tyre Reviews viktade po\u00e4ng\n<p>Continental MaxContact MC7 ligger p\u00e5 plats 4 av 7 i den h\u00e4r resultatlistan. Dess viktade po\u00e4ng i resultattabellen \u00e4r 95.4%.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>H\u00f6gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: torrt v\u00e4glag (99.4%).<\/li>\n<li>L\u00e4gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: prisv\u00e4rdhet (91.8%).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Toyo Proxes Sport 2<\/strong> \u2014 94.3% Tyre Reviews viktade po\u00e4ng\n<p>Toyo Proxes Sport 2 ligger p\u00e5 plats 5 av 7 i den h\u00e4r resultatlistan. Dess viktade po\u00e4ng i resultattabellen \u00e4r 94.3%.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>H\u00f6gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: komfort (98.6%).<\/li>\n<li>L\u00e4gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: prisv\u00e4rdhet (89.7%).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Bridgestone Potenza Sport<\/strong> \u2014 95.4% Tyre Reviews viktade po\u00e4ng\n<p>Bridgestone Potenza Sport ligger p\u00e5 plats 6 av 7 i den h\u00e4r resultatlistan. Dess viktade po\u00e4ng i resultattabellen \u00e4r 95.4%.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>H\u00f6gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: torrt v\u00e4glag (97.3%).<\/li>\n<li>L\u00e4gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: prisv\u00e4rdhet (82.1%).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Yokohama Advan Sport V107<\/strong> \u2014 94.6% Tyre Reviews viktade po\u00e4ng\n<p>Yokohama Advan Sport V107 ligger p\u00e5 plats 7 av 7 i den h\u00e4r resultatlistan. Dess viktade po\u00e4ng i resultattabellen \u00e4r 94.6%.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>H\u00f6gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: torrt v\u00e4glag (98.3%).<\/li>\n<li>L\u00e4gsta kategoripo\u00e4ng: prisv\u00e4rdhet (78.0%).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Originaltestet inneh\u00e5ller m\u00e4tv\u00e4rdena och en fullst\u00e4ndig metodbeskrivning.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/toptirereview.com\/2026-uhp-tire-test-big-brands-vs-challengers\/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Originaltest<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Top Tire Review j\u00e4mf\u00f6rde 7 d\u00e4ck i dimensionen 225\/45 R18.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7661,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7908","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dacktest.eu\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7908","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dacktest.eu\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dacktest.eu\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dacktest.eu\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dacktest.eu\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7908"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.dacktest.eu\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7908\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dacktest.eu\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7661"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dacktest.eu\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7908"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dacktest.eu\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7908"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dacktest.eu\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7908"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}