6 Shops · 92,725+ Products

Jämförelse: Barum Polaris 5 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Test profile

Barum
Polaris 5
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Antal tester
13
23
15
29
Best position
#9
#1
#6
#1
Average position
15.2
6.7
15.5
3.7
Senaste test
2024
2025
2025
2025
Tillgängliga dimensioner
76
107
28
178

Vått

Vått
Barum Polaris 5
62%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Sava Eskimo HP2
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Vattenplaning - korsade
Barum Polaris 5
64%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Sava Eskimo HP2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Våtbromsning
Barum Polaris 5
63%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Våtförmåga
Barum Polaris 5
56%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Sava Eskimo HP2
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Vattenplaning - längsgående
Barum Polaris 5
65%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Sava Eskimo HP2
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Våtsvängning
Barum Polaris 5
66%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Sava Eskimo HP2
59%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%

Snö

Snö
Barum Polaris 5
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Sava Eskimo HP2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
Snöbromsning
Barum Polaris 5
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Sava Eskimo HP2
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Snötraktion
Barum Polaris 5
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
75%
Snöhantering
Barum Polaris 5
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
65%
Snökurvtagning
Barum Polaris 5
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Sava Eskimo HP2
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%

Torr

Torr
Barum Polaris 5
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Sava Eskimo HP2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
86%
Torrbromsning
Barum Polaris 5
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Sava Eskimo HP2
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Torrhantering
Barum Polaris 5
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Torrbromsegenskaper
Barum Polaris 5
51%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Sava Eskimo HP2
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
91%

Komfort

Komfort
Barum Polaris 5
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Ljudnivå utanför kupé
Barum Polaris 5
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Sava Eskimo HP2
62%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Komfort
Barum Polaris 5
61%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Ljudnivå i kupé
Barum Polaris 5
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Sava Eskimo HP2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%

Kostnader

Kostnader
Barum Polaris 5
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
71%
Miltal
Barum Polaris 5
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Sava Eskimo HP2
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
37%
Pris/värde
Barum Polaris 5
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Sava Eskimo HP2
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
49%
Rullmotstånd
Barum Polaris 5
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%

Is

Is
Barum Polaris 5
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%
Bromsning på is
Barum Polaris 5
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

ömsesidiga provningar

OrganisationSäsongÅrDimension
AutobildAutobild
Vinter
2022215/55 R17Visa

Lägg till i jämförelsen

Popular brands
Ny jämförelse