Jämförelse: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Premium

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

VS

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

UltraGrip Performance 3

Winter

Test profile

Blizzak 6

WinterCraft WP52

Speed-Grip 5

WinterContact TS 870

Antal tester

14

10

12

17

Best position

#1

#2

#3

#1

Average position

3.6

12.2

9.3

1.7

Senaste test

2025

2024

2025

Tillgängliga dimensioner

188

207

93

80

Prestandajämförelse

Vätprestanda

84%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

67%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52

77%

Semperit

Speed-Grip 5

86%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

Våtbromsning

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

92%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

69%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

69%

Våtförmåga

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

84%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

69%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

84%

Våtsvängning

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

75%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

84%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

92%

Akvaplaning längs

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

42%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

81%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

96%

Akvaplaning tvärs

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

42%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

81%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

88%

Torr prestanda

81%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

86%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52

81%

Semperit

Speed-Grip 5

85%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

Torrbromsning

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

87%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

78%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

78%

Torrhantering

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

84%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

84%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

92%

Snöprestanda

80%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

71%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52

78%

Semperit

Speed-Grip 5

87%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

Snöbromsning

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

71%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

90%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

Snötraktion

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

88%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

71%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

71%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

88%

Snöhantering

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

69%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

78%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

87%

Snö cirkelkurvtagning

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

73%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

73%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

82%

Komfort & ljudnivå

57%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

57%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52

66%

Semperit

Speed-Grip 5

76%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

Ljudnivå exteriör

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

57%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

57%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

66%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

76%

Ekonomi

70%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

50%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52

90%

Semperit

Speed-Grip 5

90%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

Rullmotstånd

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

65%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

57%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

88%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

88%

Miltal

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

42%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

92%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

92%

Tester använda i jämförelsen

Organisation	Säsong	År	Dimension
AUTOBILD	Vinter	2024	205/55 R16	Visa

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Visa övergripande jämförelse

Jämförelse: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Blizzak 6

WinterCraft WP52

Speed-Grip 5

WinterContact TS 870

Test profile

Prestandajämförelse

Tester använda i jämförelsen

Dimensioner och priser

Lägg till i jämförelsen