Jämförelse: Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Continental VanContact Winter vs. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

Premium

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

R14 – R17

VS

Premium

Continental

VanContact Winter

R14 – R17

Premium

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

R15 – R17

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

Turanza T005

Test profile

Blizzak W810

VanContact Winter

AGILIS ALPIN

Antal tester

1

2

Best position

#7

#1

#3

Average position

7.0

1.0

3.0

Senaste test

2019

Tillgängliga dimensioner

56

46

23

Prestandajämförelse

Vätprestanda

56%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

83%

Continental

VanContact Winter

73%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

Våtbromsning

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

40%

Continental VanContact Winter

87%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

80%

Våtförmåga

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

34%

Continental VanContact Winter

90%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

70%

Våtsvängning

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

61%

Continental VanContact Winter

83%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

72%

Akvaplaning längs

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Continental VanContact Winter

78%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

67%

Akvaplaning tvärs

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Continental VanContact Winter

78%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

78%

Torr prestanda

78%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

82%

Continental

VanContact Winter

78%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

Torrbromsning

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Continental VanContact Winter

82%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

78%

Snöprestanda

79%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

77%

Continental

VanContact Winter

80%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

Snöbromsning

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Continental VanContact Winter

67%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

78%

Snötraktion

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

83%

Continental VanContact Winter

83%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

83%

Snöhantering

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

76%

Continental VanContact Winter

80%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

80%

Isprestanda

74%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

74%

Continental

VanContact Winter

84%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

Isbromsning abs

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

74%

Continental VanContact Winter

74%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

81%

Sidledsstyrning på is

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

74%

Continental VanContact Winter

74%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

86%

Komfort & ljudnivå

56%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

69%

Continental

VanContact Winter

67%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

Ljudnivå exteriör

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

44%

Continental VanContact Winter

67%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

62%

Ljudnivå interiör

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Continental VanContact Winter

71%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

71%

Ekonomi

76%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

74%

Continental

VanContact Winter

87%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

Bränsleeffektivitet

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

84%

Continental VanContact Winter

80%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

84%

Miltal

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Continental VanContact Winter

67%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

89%

Tester använda i jämförelsen

Organisation	Säsong	År	Dimension
ADAC	Vinter	2019	205/65 R16	Visa

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Visa övergripande jämförelse

Jämförelse: Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Continental VanContact Winter vs. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

Blizzak W810

VanContact Winter

AGILIS ALPIN

Test profile

Prestandajämförelse

Tester använda i jämförelsen

Dimensioner och priser

Lägg till i jämförelsen