6 Butiker · 92,725+ Produkter

Jämförelse: Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Antal tester
14
10
6
Bästa placering
#1
#2
#3
Genomsnittlig placering
3.8
6.0
4.7
Senaste test
2019
2026
2026
Tillgängliga dimensioner
35
104
146

Vått

Vått
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Våtförmåga
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Vattenplaning - korsade
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Vattenplaning - längsgående
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Våtbromsning
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Våtsvängning
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%

Torr

Torr
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Torrbromsegenskaper
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
Torrhantering
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Torrbromsning
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%

Kostnader

Kostnader
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Miltal
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Rullmotstånd
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%

Komfort

Komfort
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Ljudnivå utanför kupé
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Ljudnivå i kupé
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Lägg till i jämförelsen

Populära märken
Ny jämförelse