Jämförelse: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premium

Continental

EcoContact 6

R13 – R23

VS

övre-mellan

BFGoodrich

Jämför även med

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Testprofil

EcoContact 6

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Antal tester

5

14

3

1

Bästa placering

#7

#8

#2

#1

Genomsnittlig placering

13.0

13.4

3.3

1.0

Senaste test

2022

2026

2025

Tillgängliga dimensioner

675

153

40

64

Vått

Continental EcoContact 6

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Vattenplaning - korsade

Continental EcoContact 6

40%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Våtbromsning

Continental EcoContact 6

66%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Våtsvängning

Continental EcoContact 6

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Våtförmåga

Continental EcoContact 6

57%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Vattenplaning - längsgående

Continental EcoContact 6

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Vätprestanda

Continental EcoContact 6

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Torr

Continental EcoContact 6

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Torrbromsning

Continental EcoContact 6

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Torrhantering

Continental EcoContact 6

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Torrbromsegenskaper

Continental EcoContact 6

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Torr prestanda

Continental EcoContact 6

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Komfort

Continental EcoContact 6

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Ljudnivå utanför kupé

Continental EcoContact 6

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Ljudnivå i kupé

Continental EcoContact 6

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Komfort

Continental EcoContact 6

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Kostnader

Continental EcoContact 6

93%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Miltal

Continental EcoContact 6

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Rullmotstånd

Continental EcoContact 6

100%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Bränsleeffektivitet

Continental EcoContact 6

99%

BFGoodrich Advantage

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Jämförelse: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

EcoContact 6

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Testprofil

Vått

Torr

Komfort

Kostnader

Dimensioner och priser

Lägg till i jämförelsen