6 Butiker · 92,725+ Produkter

Jämförelse: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Continental
PremiumContact 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Antal tester
36
3
5
3
Bästa placering
#1
#2
#1
#2
Genomsnittlig placering
3.1
3.3
2.2
3.7
Senaste test
2023
2026
2025
2025
Tillgängliga dimensioner
296
40
63
34

Vått

Vått
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Vattenplaning - längsgående
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Våtbromsning
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Vattenplaning - korsade
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Våtförmåga
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Våtsvängning
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Våt sido guide
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Vätprestanda
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Torr

Torr
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Torrbromsning
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Torrhantering
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Torrbromsegenskaper
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Fältbyte i torrt väglag
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Styrrespons i torrt väglag
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Torr prestanda
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%

Komfort

Komfort
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ljudnivå utanför kupé
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ljudnivå i kupé
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%

Offroad

Offroad
Continental PremiumContact 6
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Grästraktion
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hantering på grus
Continental PremiumContact 6
93%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
76%
Grustraktion
Continental PremiumContact 6
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Lertraktion
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
76%
Sandtraktion
Continental PremiumContact 6
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
80%

Kostnader

Kostnader
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rullmotstånd
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Miltal
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bränsleeffektivitet
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Pris/värde
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Lägg till i jämförelsen

Populära märken
Ny jämförelse