Jämförelse: Continental VanContact Winter vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

Premium

Continental

VanContact Winter

R14 – R17

VS

Premium

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

R14 – R17

Premium

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

R15 – R17

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

Turanza T005

Test profile

VanContact Winter

Blizzak W810

AGILIS ALPIN

Antal tester

2

1

2

Best position

#1

#7

#3

Average position

1.0

7.0

3.0

Senaste test

2019

Tillgängliga dimensioner

46

56

23

Prestandajämförelse

Vätprestanda

83%

Continental

VanContact Winter

56%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

73%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

Våtbromsning

Continental VanContact Winter

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

40%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

80%

Våtförmåga

Continental VanContact Winter

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

34%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

70%

Våtsvängning

Continental VanContact Winter

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

61%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

72%

Akvaplaning längs

Continental VanContact Winter

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

67%

Akvaplaning tvärs

Continental VanContact Winter

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

78%

Torr prestanda

82%

Continental

VanContact Winter

78%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

78%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

Torrbromsning

Continental VanContact Winter

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

78%

Snöprestanda

77%

Continental

VanContact Winter

79%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

80%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

Snöbromsning

Continental VanContact Winter

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

78%

Snötraktion

Continental VanContact Winter

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

83%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

83%

Snöhantering

Continental VanContact Winter

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

76%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

80%

Isprestanda

74%

Continental

VanContact Winter

74%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

84%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

Isbromsning abs

Continental VanContact Winter

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

74%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

81%

Sidledsstyrning på is

Continental VanContact Winter

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

74%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

86%

Komfort & ljudnivå

69%

Continental

VanContact Winter

56%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

67%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

Ljudnivå exteriör

Continental VanContact Winter

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

44%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

62%

Ljudnivå interiör

Continental VanContact Winter

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

71%

Ekonomi

74%

Continental

VanContact Winter

76%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

87%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

Bränsleeffektivitet

Continental VanContact Winter

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

84%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

84%

Miltal

Continental VanContact Winter

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

89%

Tester använda i jämförelsen

Organisation	Säsong	År	Dimension
ADAC	Vinter	2019	205/65 R16	Visa

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Visa övergripande jämförelse

Jämförelse: Continental VanContact Winter vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

VanContact Winter

Blizzak W810

AGILIS ALPIN

Test profile

Prestandajämförelse

Tester använda i jämförelsen

Dimensioner och priser

Lägg till i jämförelsen