Jämförelse: Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Michelin Alpin 5

Premium

Continental

WinterContact TS 860

R13 – R17

VS

Premium

Goodyear

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

WinterContact TS 860

UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

Blizzak LM-001

Alpin 5

Antal tester

23

15

17

Best position

#1

#4

#2

Average position

2.3

2.7

7.9

5.9

Senaste test

2021

2018

Tillgängliga dimensioner

76

101

132

91

Torr

Continental WinterContact TS 860

84%

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Michelin Alpin 5

84%

Torrbromsning

Continental WinterContact TS 860

82%

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Michelin Alpin 5

80%

Torrhantering

Continental WinterContact TS 860

91%

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Michelin Alpin 5

87%

Torrbromsegenskaper

Continental WinterContact TS 860

73%

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Michelin Alpin 5

89%

Torr prestanda

Continental WinterContact TS 860

80%

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

88%

Michelin Alpin 5

86%

Vått

Continental WinterContact TS 860

92%

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

79%

Michelin Alpin 5

79%

Våtbromsning

Continental WinterContact TS 860

89%

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

62%

Michelin Alpin 5

74%

Vattenplaning - korsade

Continental WinterContact TS 860

85%

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Michelin Alpin 5

83%

Vattenplaning - längsgående

Continental WinterContact TS 860

90%

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

87%

Michelin Alpin 5

87%

Våtsvängning

Continental WinterContact TS 860

90%

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

67%

Michelin Alpin 5

77%

Våtförmåga

Continental WinterContact TS 860

94%

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Michelin Alpin 5

76%

Vätprestanda

Continental WinterContact TS 860

91%

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

81%

Michelin Alpin 5

79%

Snö

Continental WinterContact TS 860

91%

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Michelin Alpin 5

72%

Snötraktion

Continental WinterContact TS 860

88%

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Michelin Alpin 5

68%

Snöbromsning

Continental WinterContact TS 860

90%

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

88%

Michelin Alpin 5

76%

Snöhantering

Continental WinterContact TS 860

87%

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

94%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Michelin Alpin 5

71%

Snökurvtagning

Continental WinterContact TS 860

93%

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

86%

Michelin Alpin 5

71%

Snöprestanda

Continental WinterContact TS 860

88%

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

92%

Michelin Alpin 5

59%

Komfort

Continental WinterContact TS 860

79%

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

50%

Michelin Alpin 5

66%

Ljudnivå utanför kupé

Continental WinterContact TS 860

80%

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

75%

Michelin Alpin 5

63%

Ljudnivå i kupé

Continental WinterContact TS 860

77%

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

33%

Michelin Alpin 5

67%

Komfort

Continental WinterContact TS 860

90%

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

89%

Michelin Alpin 5

87%

Kostnader

Continental WinterContact TS 860

79%

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Michelin Alpin 5

79%

Miltal

Continental WinterContact TS 860

77%

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

76%

Michelin Alpin 5

96%

Rullmotstånd

Continental WinterContact TS 860

82%

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Michelin Alpin 5

68%

Bränsleeffektivitet

Continental WinterContact TS 860

87%

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

94%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

79%

Michelin Alpin 5

75%

Pris/värde

Continental WinterContact TS 860

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

70%

Michelin Alpin 5

97%

Is

Continental WinterContact TS 860

80%

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Michelin Alpin 5

79%

Sidledsstyrning på is

Continental WinterContact TS 860

76%

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Michelin Alpin 5

78%

Bromsning på is

Continental WinterContact TS 860

82%

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Michelin Alpin 5

81%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

ömsesidiga provningar

Organisation	Säsong	År	Dimension
Autobild	Vinter	2017	225/50 R17	Visa
Autobild	Vinter	2017	225/50 R17	Visa
Autoexpress	Vinter	2017	225/45 R17	Visa
Autoexpress	Vinter	2016	205/55 R16	Visa

Jämförelse: Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen-1 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Michelin Alpin 5

WinterContact TS 860

UltraGrip Performance Gen-1

Blizzak LM-001

Alpin 5

Test profile

Torr

Vått

Snö

Komfort

Kostnader

Is

Dimensioner och priser

ömsesidiga provningar

Lägg till i jämförelsen