Jämförelse: Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Premium

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

VS

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

UltraGrip Performance 3

Winter

Test profile

WinterContact TS 870

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Speed-Grip 5

Blizzak 6

Antal tester

17

23

12

14

Best position

#1

#3

#1

Average position

1.7

6.7

9.3

3.6

Senaste test

2025

Tillgängliga dimensioner

80

107

93

188

Prestandajämförelse

Vätprestanda

86%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

73%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Semperit

Speed-Grip 5

84%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

Våtbromsning

Continental WinterContact TS 870

69%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

61%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Våtförmåga

Continental WinterContact TS 870

84%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Våtsvängning

Continental WinterContact TS 870

92%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

67%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Akvaplaning längs

Continental WinterContact TS 870

96%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

88%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

73%

Akvaplaning tvärs

Continental WinterContact TS 870

88%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

73%

Torr prestanda

85%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

68%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Semperit

Speed-Grip 5

81%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

Torrbromsning

Continental WinterContact TS 870

78%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Torrhantering

Continental WinterContact TS 870

92%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

67%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Snöprestanda

87%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

82%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

78%

Semperit

Speed-Grip 5

80%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

Snöbromsning

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

90%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Snötraktion

Continental WinterContact TS 870

88%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

88%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

88%

Snöhantering

Continental WinterContact TS 870

87%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

69%

Snö cirkelkurvtagning

Continental WinterContact TS 870

82%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Komfort & ljudnivå

76%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

76%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

66%

Semperit

Speed-Grip 5

57%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

Ljudnivå exteriör

Continental WinterContact TS 870

76%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

76%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

57%

Ekonomi

90%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

70%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

90%

Semperit

Speed-Grip 5

70%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

Rullmotstånd

Continental WinterContact TS 870

88%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

65%

Miltal

Continental WinterContact TS 870

92%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

67%

Semperit Speed-Grip 5

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Tester använda i jämförelsen

Organisation	Säsong	År	Dimension
AUTOBILD	Vinter	2024	205/55 R16	Visa

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Visa övergripande jämförelse

Jämförelse: Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

WinterContact TS 870

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Speed-Grip 5

Blizzak 6

Test profile

Prestandajämförelse

Tester använda i jämförelsen

Dimensioner och priser

Lägg till i jämförelsen