Jämförelse: Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

Premium

Dunlop

Winter Sport 5

VS

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

Winter Sport 5

Winterhawk 3

MP92 Sibir Snow

WinterContact TS 860

Antal tester

48

14

8

23

Best position

#1

#3

#12

#1

Average position

4.9

16.0

22.3

2.3

Senaste test

2025

2020

2021

Tillgängliga dimensioner

189

66

43

76

Prestandajämförelse

Vätprestanda

91%

Dunlop

Winter Sport 5

70%

Firestone

Winterhawk 3

71%

Matador

MP92 Sibir Snow

91%

Continental

WinterContact TS 860

Våtbromsning

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

95%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

73%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

84%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

95%

Våtförmåga

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

87%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

55%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

71%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

92%

Våtsvängning

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

95%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

63%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

68%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

89%

Akvaplaning längs

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

81%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

76%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

65%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

92%

Akvaplaning tvärs

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

97%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

81%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

65%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

87%

Torr prestanda

84%

Dunlop

Winter Sport 5

76%

Firestone

Winterhawk 3

76%

Matador

MP92 Sibir Snow

81%

Continental

WinterContact TS 860

Torrbromsning

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

81%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

76%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

76%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

81%

Torrhantering

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

87%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

76%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

76%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

81%

Snöprestanda

82%

Dunlop

Winter Sport 5

85%

Firestone

Winterhawk 3

77%

Matador

MP92 Sibir Snow

86%

Continental

WinterContact TS 860

Snöbromsning

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

81%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

87%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

76%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

92%

Snötraktion

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

89%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

84%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

73%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

79%

Snöhantering

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

81%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

81%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

81%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

87%

Snö cirkelkurvtagning

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

76%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

87%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

76%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

87%

Komfort & ljudnivå

88%

Dunlop

Winter Sport 5

78%

Firestone

Winterhawk 3

88%

Matador

MP92 Sibir Snow

93%

Continental

WinterContact TS 860

Ljudnivå exteriör

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

89%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

84%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

89%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

89%

Körkomfort

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

87%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

71%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

87%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

97%

Ekonomi

87%

Dunlop

Winter Sport 5

79%

Firestone

Winterhawk 3

71%

Matador

MP92 Sibir Snow

82%

Continental

WinterContact TS 860

Rullmotstånd

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

84%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

79%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

79%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

84%

Miltal

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

89%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

79%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

63%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

79%

Tester använda i jämförelsen

Organisation	Säsong	År	Dimension
Autobild	Vinter	2018	195/65 R15	Visa

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Visa övergripande jämförelse

Jämförelse: Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

Winter Sport 5

Winterhawk 3

MP92 Sibir Snow

WinterContact TS 860

Test profile

Prestandajämförelse

Tester använda i jämförelsen

Dimensioner och priser

Lägg till i jämförelsen