6 Shops · 92,725+ Products
DACKTEST.EU

Jämförelse: Firestone Destination HP vs. Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Firestone Destination HPövre-mellan
FirestoneFirestone

Destination HP

R15 – R20
Continental EcoContact 6Premium
ContinentalContinental

EcoContact 6

R13 – R23
Kumho Ecsta HS52övre-mellan
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Also compare with
PremiumContact 7 Efficientgrip 2 SUV Turanza T005

Test profile

Firestone
Destination HP
Continental
EcoContact 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Antal tester
1
5
10
Best position
#3
#7
#2
Average position
3.0
13.0
6.0
Senaste test
2017
2022
2026
Tillgängliga dimensioner
35
676
104

Vått

Vått
Firestone Destination HP
74%
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Våtbromsning
Firestone Destination HP
80%
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Våtsvängning
Firestone Destination HP
64%
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Vattenplaning - korsade
Firestone Destination HP
78%
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Våtförmåga
Firestone Destination HP
61%
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Vattenplaning - längsgående
Firestone Destination HP
83%
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Kostnader

Kostnader
Firestone Destination HP
67%
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Miltal
Firestone Destination HP
60%
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Destination HP
73%
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Ljudnivå utanför kupé
Firestone Destination HP
62%
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Ljudnivå i kupé
Firestone Destination HP
81%
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%

Torr

Torr
Firestone Destination HP
92%
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Lägg till i jämförelsen

Popular brands
Ny jämförelse