Jämförelse: Firestone Roadhawk vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

övre-mellan

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Jämför även med

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Roadhawk

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Ventus Evo

Antal tester

21

14

3

Bästa placering

#2

#8

#2

Genomsnittlig placering

11.9

13.4

3.3

3.7

3.3

Senaste test

2024

2026

2025

2026

Tillgängliga dimensioner

164

153

40

34

60

Vått

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Vattenplaning - korsade

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Vattenplaning - längsgående

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Våtbromsning

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Våtförmåga

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Våtsvängning

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Våt sido guide

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Torr

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Torrbromsning

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Torrhantering

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Torrbromsegenskaper

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Komfort

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Ljudnivå utanför kupé

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Komfort

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Ljudnivå i kupé

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Kostnader

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Miltal

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Rullmotstånd

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Pris/värde

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Jämförelse: Firestone Roadhawk vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Roadhawk

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Vått

Torr

Komfort

Kostnader

Dimensioner och priser

Lägg till i jämförelsen