6 Butiker · 92,725+ Produkter

Jämförelse: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
Continental
EcoContact 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Antal tester
21
5
10
18
3
Bästa placering
#2
#7
#2
#1
#2
Genomsnittlig placering
11.9
13.0
6.0
6.1
3.3
Senaste test
2024
2022
2026
2024
2026
Tillgängliga dimensioner
164
676
104
47
40

Vått

Vått
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Vattenplaning - korsade
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Vattenplaning - längsgående
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Våtförmåga
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Våtbromsning
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Våtsvängning
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%

Torr

Torr
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Torrbromsning
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Torrhantering
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Torrbromsegenskaper
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Ljudnivå utanför kupé
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Ljudnivå i kupé
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Kostnader

Kostnader
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Miltal
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rullmotstånd
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Pris/värde
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Continental EcoContact 6
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Bränsleeffektivitet
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Continental EcoContact 6
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Lägg till i jämförelsen

Populära märken
Ny jämförelse