6 Butiker · 92,725+ Produkter

Jämförelse: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
Fulda
EcoControl HP
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Antal tester
21
6
10
Bästa placering
#2
#6
#2
Genomsnittlig placering
11.9
9.8
6.0
Senaste test
2024
2018
2026
Tillgängliga dimensioner
164
70
104

Vått

Vått
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Vattenplaning - korsade
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Vattenplaning - längsgående
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Våtbromsning
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Våtförmåga
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Våtsvängning
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%

Torr

Torr
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Torrbromsning
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Torrhantering
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Ljudnivå utanför kupé
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Ljudnivå i kupé
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%

Kostnader

Kostnader
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Rullmotstånd
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Miltal
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Pris/värde
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Lägg till i jämförelsen

Populära märken
Ny jämförelse