Jämförelse: Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

övre-mellan

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Jämför även med

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 4 S

Pilot Sport 5

Testprofil

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Antal tester

21

3

26

Bästa placering

#2

#1

Genomsnittlig placering

11.9

3.3

2.2

Senaste test

2024

2026

Tillgängliga dimensioner

164

40

60

66

Vått

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Vattenplaning - korsade

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Vattenplaning - längsgående

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Våtbromsning

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Våtförmåga

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Våtsvängning

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Torr

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Torrbromsning

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Torrhantering

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Torrbromsegenskaper

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Komfort

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Ljudnivå utanför kupé

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Ljudnivå i kupé

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

88%

Komfort

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Kostnader

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Rullmotstånd

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Miltal

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Pris/värde

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Jämförelse: Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Vått

Torr

Komfort

Kostnader

Dimensioner och priser

Lägg till i jämförelsen