Jämförelse: Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

övre-mellan

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Jämför även med

PILOT ALPIN 5

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 4 S

Testprofil

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

PremiumContact 7

Ventus Evo

Antal tester

21

—

3

26

3

Bästa placering

#2

—

#2

#1

#2

Genomsnittlig placering

11.9

—

3.3

2.2

3.3

Senaste test

2024

—

2026

Tillgängliga dimensioner

164

123

40

66

60

Vått

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Vattenplaning - korsade

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Vattenplaning - längsgående

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Våtbromsning

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Våtförmåga

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Våtsvängning

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Torr

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Torrbromsning

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Torrhantering

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Torrbromsegenskaper

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Komfort

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Ljudnivå utanför kupé

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Ljudnivå i kupé

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

88%

Komfort

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Kostnader

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Rullmotstånd

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Miltal

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Pris/värde

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Jämförelse: Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

PremiumContact 7

Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Vått

Torr

Komfort

Kostnader

Dimensioner och priser

Lägg till i jämförelsen