Jämförelse: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Premium

Goodyear

Efficientgrip Compact

R13 – R15

VS

Premium

Michelin

Jämför även med

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Efficientgrip Compact

e.Primacy

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Antal tester

1

4

2

3

18

1

5

Bästa placering

#10

#3

#1

#2

#1

Genomsnittlig placering

10.0

12.0

1.0

3.3

6.1

1.0

2.2

Senaste test

2018

2025

2026

2024

2025

Tillgängliga dimensioner

42

111

23

40

47

64

63

Vått

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

65%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Vattenplaning - korsade

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Våtförmåga

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

34%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Vattenplaning - längsgående

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Våtbromsning

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Våtsvängning

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

39%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Kostnader

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Miltal

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Komfort

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Ljudnivå utanför kupé

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

43%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Torr

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Jämförelse: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Compact

e.Primacy

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Vått

Kostnader

Komfort

Torr

Dimensioner och priser

Lägg till i jämförelsen