Jämförelse: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Dunlop Winter

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip SUV

R16 – R22

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Jämför även med

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Ventus Evo

Winter

Antal tester

—

3

1

3

2

Bästa placering

—

#2

#1

#2

#1

Genomsnittlig placering

—

3.3

1.0

3.3

1.5

Senaste test

—

2026

2025

2026

2025

Tillgängliga dimensioner

123

40

64

60

65

Vått

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Vattenplaning - korsade

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Vattenplaning - längsgående

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Våtbromsning

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Våtsvängning

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Våtförmåga

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Torr

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Torrhantering

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Torrbromsning

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Kostnader

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Rullmotstånd

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Miltal

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Ljudnivå utanför kupé

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Jämförelse: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Dunlop Winter

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Ventus Evo

Winter

Testprofil

Vått

Torr

Kostnader

Komfort

Dimensioner och priser

Lägg till i jämförelsen