6 Shops · 92,725+ Products

Jämförelse: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 vs. Dunlop Winter

Test profile

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Semperit
Speed-Grip 5
Dunlop
Winter
Antal tester
23
29
12
2
Best position
#1
#1
#3
#1
Average position
3.3
3.7
9.3
1.5
Senaste test
2025
2025
2025
2025
Tillgängliga dimensioner
176
178
93
65

Torr

Torr
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
86%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
64%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Torrbromsning
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
49%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Torrhantering
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
76%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Fältbyte i torrt väglag
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Styrrespons i torrt väglag
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Torr prestanda
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
69%
Dunlop Winter
78%

Snö

Snö
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
68%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Snöbromsning
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
66%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Snöhantering
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
65%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
72%
Dunlop Winter
79%
Snötraktion
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
75%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
60%
Dunlop Winter
96%
Snökurvtagning
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
73%
Dunlop Winter
96%
Snöprestanda
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
85%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
63%
Dunlop Winter
88%

Vått

Vått
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
64%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Våtförmåga
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
68%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Våtbromsning
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
58%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Vattenplaning - korsade
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
69%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Vattenplaning - längsgående
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
64%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Våtsvängning
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
63%
Dunlop Winter
63%

Kostnader

Kostnader
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
71%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
71%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Rullmotstånd
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
83%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Miltal
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
37%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
45%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Pris/värde
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
49%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
79%
Dunlop Winter
84%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
68%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Ljudnivå utanför kupé
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
69%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Komfort
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Ljudnivå i kupé
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
67%

Is

Is
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
28%
Bromsning på is
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
28%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Lägg till i jämförelsen

Popular brands
Ny jämförelse