6 Butiker · 92,725+ Produkter
DACKTEST.EU

Jämförelse: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Kumho Ecsta HS52övre-mellan
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
BFGoodrich Advantageövre-mellan
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Falken e.Ziexövre-mellan
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Hankook Ventus EvoPremium
HankookHankook

Ventus Evo

9.8
R17 – R22
Jämför även med
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Antal tester
10
14
3
3
3
Bästa placering
#2
#8
#2
#2
#2
Genomsnittlig placering
6.0
13.4
3.3
3.7
3.3
Senaste test
2026
2026
2026
2025
2026
Tillgängliga dimensioner
104
153
40
34
60

Vått

Vått
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Våtbromsning
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Vattenplaning - korsade
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Vattenplaning - längsgående
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Våtsvängning
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Våtförmåga
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%

Komfort

Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Ljudnivå utanför kupé
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%

Torr

Torr
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Torrbromsning
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Torrhantering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%

Kostnader

Kostnader
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Rullmotstånd
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Miltal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Lägg till i jämförelsen

Populära märken
Ny jämförelse