6 butiker · 92 725+ produkter

Jämförelse: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Continental UltraContact vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Continental
UltraContact
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Antal tester
3
1
4
18
6
Bästa placering
#6
#7
#2
#1
#3
Genomsnittlig placering
9.0
7.0
3.3
6.1
4.7
Senaste test
2026
2023
2026
2024
2026
Tillgängliga dimensioner
91
87
40
47
146

Dessa däck har inte testats tillsammans i samma test. poängen nedan är sammanställda från olika oberoende tester, varför direkt jämförelse bör tolkas med försiktighet.

Vått
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Vattenplaning - längsgående
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Continental UltraContact
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Våtförmåga
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Våtbromsning
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Continental UltraContact
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Vattenplaning - korsade
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Continental UltraContact
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Våtsvängning
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Torr
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Continental UltraContact
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Torrbromsning
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Continental UltraContact
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Torrhantering
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Komfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Ljudnivå utanför kupé
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Komfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Kostnader
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Continental UltraContact
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rullmotstånd
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Miltal
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Continental UltraContact
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Tread pattern comparison

Nokian Powerproof 2
Continental UltraContact
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Lägga till i jämförelsen

Populära märken
Ny jämförelse

Dacktest.eu

Gratis — i App Store

HÄMTA

Dacktest.eu

Gratis — i App Store

Jämför däck, läs testresultat och hitta de bästa priserna — allt i en app.

Visa i App Store