Jämförelse: Nokian WetProof vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

övre-mellan

Nokian

WetProof

VS

Jämför även med

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

WetProof

Roadhawk 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Antal tester

14

6

3

5

3

Bästa placering

#1

#3

#2

#1

#2

Genomsnittlig placering

5.6

4.7

3.3

2.2

3.7

Senaste test

2023

2026

2025

Tillgängliga dimensioner

47

146

40

63

34

Vått

Nokian WetProof

84%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Vattenplaning - korsade

Nokian WetProof

72%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Vattenplaning - längsgående

Nokian WetProof

81%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Våtförmåga

Nokian WetProof

86%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Våtbromsning

Nokian WetProof

85%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Våtsvängning

Nokian WetProof

91%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Våt sido guide

Nokian WetProof

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Torr

Nokian WetProof

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Torrbromsning

Nokian WetProof

87%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Torrhantering

Nokian WetProof

80%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Fältbyte i torrt väglag

Nokian WetProof

81%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Komfort

Nokian WetProof

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Ljudnivå utanför kupé

Nokian WetProof

86%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Komfort

Nokian WetProof

87%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kostnader

Nokian WetProof

60%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rullmotstånd

Nokian WetProof

61%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Miltal

Nokian WetProof

56%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Jämförelse: Nokian WetProof vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

WetProof

Roadhawk 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Testprofil

Vått

Torr

Komfort

Kostnader

Dimensioner och priser

Lägg till i jämförelsen