Jämförelse: Nokian WetProof vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

övre-mellan

Nokian

WetProof

VS

Jämför även med

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

WetProof

Efficient Grip Performance

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Antal tester

14

16

3

1

Bästa placering

#1

#3

#2

#1

Genomsnittlig placering

5.6

5.5

3.3

1.0

Senaste test

2023

2026

2025

Tillgängliga dimensioner

47

153

40

64

Vått

Nokian WetProof

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Vattenplaning - korsade

Nokian WetProof

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Vattenplaning - längsgående

Nokian WetProof

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Våtbromsning

Nokian WetProof

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Våtförmåga

Nokian WetProof

86%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Våtsvängning

Nokian WetProof

91%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Våt sido guide

Nokian WetProof

89%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Torr

Nokian WetProof

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Torrbromsning

Nokian WetProof

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Torrhantering

Nokian WetProof

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Fältbyte i torrt väglag

Nokian WetProof

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Torrbromsegenskaper

Nokian WetProof

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Komfort

Nokian WetProof

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Ljudnivå utanför kupé

Nokian WetProof

86%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Ljudnivå i kupé

Nokian WetProof

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Komfort

Nokian WetProof

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Kostnader

Nokian WetProof

60%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rullmotstånd

Nokian WetProof

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Miltal

Nokian WetProof

56%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Bränsleeffektivitet

Nokian WetProof

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Jämförelse: Nokian WetProof vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

WetProof

Efficient Grip Performance

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Testprofil

Vått

Torr

Komfort

Kostnader

Dimensioner och priser

Lägg till i jämförelsen