6 Butiker · 92,725+ Produkter
DACKTEST.EU

Jämförelse: Nordman South vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

NordmanNordman

South

R13 – R
Kumho Ecsta HS52övre-mellan
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Firestone Roadhawk 2övre-mellan
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Jämför även med
PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Nordman
South
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Antal tester
1
10
6
3
Bästa placering
#8
#2
#3
#2
Genomsnittlig placering
8.0
6.0
4.7
3.3
Senaste test
2025
2026
2026
2026
Tillgängliga dimensioner
—
104
146
40

Vått

Vått
Nordman South
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Vattenplaning - längsgående
Nordman South
58%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Våtbromsning
Nordman South
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%

Torr

Torr
Nordman South
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Torrbromsning
Nordman South
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Torrhantering
Nordman South
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Komfort

Komfort
Nordman South
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%

Kostnader

Kostnader
Nordman South
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rullmotstånd
Nordman South
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Lägg till i jämförelsen

Populära märken
Ny jämförelse