Jämförelse: Viking Fourtech vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

övre-mellan

BFGoodrich

Jämför även med

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Fourtech

Advantage

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Ventus Evo

Antal tester

5

14

3

5

3

Bästa placering

#11

#8

#2

#1

#2

Genomsnittlig placering

17.0

13.4

3.7

2.2

3.3

Senaste test

2021

2026

2025

2026

Tillgängliga dimensioner

32

153

34

63

60

Vått

Viking Fourtech

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Våtsvängning

Viking Fourtech

55%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Våtförmåga

Viking Fourtech

59%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Vattenplaning - korsade

Viking Fourtech

96%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Vattenplaning - längsgående

Viking Fourtech

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Våtbromsning

Viking Fourtech

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Snö

Viking Fourtech

71%

Kostnader

Viking Fourtech

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Miltal

Viking Fourtech

65%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Pris/värde

Viking Fourtech

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Rullmotstånd

Viking Fourtech

96%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Torr

Viking Fourtech

59%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Torrhantering

Viking Fourtech

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Torrbromsning

Viking Fourtech

47%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Komfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Ljudnivå utanför kupé

Viking Fourtech

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Komfort

Viking Fourtech

66%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Jämförelse: Viking Fourtech vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Fourtech

Advantage

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Vått

Snö

Kostnader

Torr

Komfort

Dimensioner och priser

Lägg till i jämförelsen