Jämförelse: Viking Fourtech vs. Ceat WinterDrive vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Ceat

Jämför även med

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofil

Fourtech

WinterDrive

WinterCraft WP52+

Blizzak 6

Antal tester

5

4

3

14

Bästa placering

#11

#10

#4

#1

Genomsnittlig placering

17.0

4.3

3.6

Senaste test

2021

2025

Tillgängliga dimensioner

32

37

97

188

Vått

Viking Fourtech

70%

Ceat WinterDrive

27%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Våtbromsning

Viking Fourtech

71%

Ceat WinterDrive

25%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Våtsvängning

Viking Fourtech

55%

Ceat WinterDrive

55%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Våtförmåga

Viking Fourtech

59%

Ceat WinterDrive

51%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Vattenplaning - korsade

Viking Fourtech

96%

Ceat WinterDrive

9%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Vattenplaning - längsgående

Viking Fourtech

77%

Ceat WinterDrive

2%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Snö

Viking Fourtech

71%

Ceat WinterDrive

54%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Snötraktion

Viking Fourtech

51%

Ceat WinterDrive

35%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Snöbromsning

Viking Fourtech

82%

Ceat WinterDrive

39%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Snökurvtagning

Viking Fourtech

67%

Ceat WinterDrive

71%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Snöhantering

Viking Fourtech

71%

Ceat WinterDrive

71%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Kostnader

Viking Fourtech

84%

Ceat WinterDrive

70%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Rullmotstånd

Viking Fourtech

96%

Ceat WinterDrive

65%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Miltal

Viking Fourtech

65%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Pris/värde

Viking Fourtech

77%

Ceat WinterDrive

92%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Komfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

Ceat WinterDrive

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Komfort

Viking Fourtech

66%

Ceat WinterDrive

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Ljudnivå utanför kupé

Viking Fourtech

76%

Ceat WinterDrive

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Torr

Viking Fourtech

59%

Ceat WinterDrive

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Torrbromsning

Viking Fourtech

47%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Torrhantering

Viking Fourtech

71%

Ceat WinterDrive

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Jämförelse: Viking Fourtech vs. Ceat WinterDrive vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Fourtech

WinterDrive

WinterCraft WP52+

Blizzak 6

Testprofil

Vått

Snö

Kostnader

Komfort

Torr

Dimensioner och priser

Lägg till i jämförelsen