Jämförelse: Viking Fourtech vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Premium

Goodyear

Jämför även med

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Fourtech

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Cinturato (C3)

Antal tester

5

18

3

1

3

4

Bästa placering

#11

#1

#2

#1

#2

#1

Genomsnittlig placering

17.0

6.1

3.3

1.0

3.7

3.3

Senaste test

2021

2024

2026

2025

2026

Tillgängliga dimensioner

32

47

40

64

34

—

Vått

Viking Fourtech

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

94%

Våtsvängning

Viking Fourtech

55%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Våtförmåga

Viking Fourtech

59%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

89%

Vattenplaning - korsade

Viking Fourtech

96%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Vattenplaning - längsgående

Viking Fourtech

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

94%

Våtbromsning

Viking Fourtech

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

97%

Snö

Viking Fourtech

71%

Kostnader

Viking Fourtech

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

87%

Miltal

Viking Fourtech

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Rullmotstånd

Viking Fourtech

96%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

87%

Komfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

89%

Ljudnivå utanför kupé

Viking Fourtech

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Torr

Viking Fourtech

59%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Torrbromsning

Viking Fourtech

47%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Torrhantering

Viking Fourtech

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Jämförelse: Viking Fourtech vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

Fourtech

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Vått

Snö

Kostnader

Komfort

Torr

Dimensioner och priser

Lägg till i jämförelsen