Jämförelse: Viking Fourtech vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Premium

Goodyear

Jämför även med

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato All Season SF3

Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Fourtech

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

CrossClimate 2

Antal tester

5

2

3

24

Bästa placering

#11

#1

#2

#1

Genomsnittlig placering

17.0

2.2

1.0

3.3

2.7

Senaste test

2021

2025

2026

2025

Tillgängliga dimensioner

32

63

23

40

151

Vått

Viking Fourtech

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

72%

Våtsvängning

Viking Fourtech

55%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

77%

Våtförmåga

Viking Fourtech

59%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

Vattenplaning - korsade

Viking Fourtech

96%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

Vattenplaning - längsgående

Viking Fourtech

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

79%

Våtbromsning

Viking Fourtech

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

Snö

Viking Fourtech

71%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Snöbromsning

Viking Fourtech

82%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

90%

Snökurvtagning

Viking Fourtech

67%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

93%

Snöhantering

Viking Fourtech

71%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Snötraktion

Viking Fourtech

51%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Kostnader

Viking Fourtech

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

78%

Miltal

Viking Fourtech

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

Pris/värde

Viking Fourtech

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

43%

Rullmotstånd

Viking Fourtech

96%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

Torr

Viking Fourtech

59%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

Torrhantering

Viking Fourtech

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

82%

Torrbromsning

Viking Fourtech

47%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Komfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

73%

Ljudnivå utanför kupé

Viking Fourtech

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

84%

Komfort

Viking Fourtech

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

83%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Jämförelse: Viking Fourtech vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

Fourtech

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

CrossClimate 2

Testprofil

Vått

Snö

Kostnader

Torr

Komfort

Dimensioner och priser

Lägg till i jämförelsen