Jämförelse: Viking Fourtech vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Jämför även med

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Fourtech

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Ventus Evo

e.Ziex

Antal tester

5

3

1

3

Bästa placering

#11

#2

#1

#2

Genomsnittlig placering

17.0

3.3

1.0

3.3

3.7

Senaste test

2021

2026

2025

2026

2025

Tillgängliga dimensioner

32

40

64

60

34

Vått

Viking Fourtech

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Vattenplaning - längsgående

Viking Fourtech

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Våtbromsning

Viking Fourtech

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Våtsvängning

Viking Fourtech

55%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Våtförmåga

Viking Fourtech

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Vattenplaning - korsade

Viking Fourtech

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Snö

Viking Fourtech

71%

Kostnader

Viking Fourtech

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rullmotstånd

Viking Fourtech

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Miltal

Viking Fourtech

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Komfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Ljudnivå utanför kupé

Viking Fourtech

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Torr

Viking Fourtech

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Torrbromsning

Viking Fourtech

47%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Torrhantering

Viking Fourtech

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Jämförelse: Viking Fourtech vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Fourtech

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Ventus Evo

e.Ziex

Testprofil

Vått

Snö

Kostnader

Komfort

Torr

Dimensioner och priser

Lägg till i jämförelsen