Jämförelse: Viking Fourtech vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Premium

Michelin

Jämför även med

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Fourtech

CrossClimate 2

UltraGrip Performance+

Ventus Evo

Antal tester

5

24

23

3

Bästa placering

#11

#1

#2

Genomsnittlig placering

17.0

2.7

3.3

Senaste test

2021

2025

2026

Tillgängliga dimensioner

32

151

176

60

Vått

Viking Fourtech

70%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Vattenplaning - korsade

Viking Fourtech

96%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Vattenplaning - längsgående

Viking Fourtech

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Våtbromsning

Viking Fourtech

71%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Våtsvängning

Viking Fourtech

55%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Våtförmåga

Viking Fourtech

59%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Snö

Viking Fourtech

71%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Snöhantering

Viking Fourtech

71%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Snötraktion

Viking Fourtech

51%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Snöbromsning

Viking Fourtech

82%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Snökurvtagning

Viking Fourtech

67%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

93%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

88%

Kostnader

Viking Fourtech

84%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Pris/värde

Viking Fourtech

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

43%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Rullmotstånd

Viking Fourtech

96%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Miltal

Viking Fourtech

65%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Komfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Ljudnivå utanför kupé

Viking Fourtech

76%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Komfort

Viking Fourtech

66%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Torr

Viking Fourtech

59%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Torrbromsning

Viking Fourtech

47%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Torrhantering

Viking Fourtech

71%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Jämförelse: Viking Fourtech vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Fourtech

CrossClimate 2

UltraGrip Performance+

Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Vått

Snö

Kostnader

Komfort

Torr

Dimensioner och priser

Lägg till i jämförelsen