6 butiker · 92 725+ produkter

Jämförelse: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Dunlop Winter

Testprofil

Continental
EcoContact 6
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Dunlop
Winter
Antal tester
5
18
6
23
2
Bästa placering
#7
#1
#3
#1
#1
Genomsnittlig placering
13.0
6.1
4.7
3.3
1.5
Senaste test
2022
2024
2026
2025
2025
Tillgängliga dimensioner
680
47
146
176
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Vått
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Våtförmåga
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Vattenplaning - korsade
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Våtbromsning
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Våtsvängning
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Vattenplaning - längsgående
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Torr
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Torrbromsning
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Torrhantering
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Fältbyte i torrt väglag
Continental EcoContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Komfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Ljudnivå utanför kupé
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Komfort
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Ljudnivå i kupé
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Kostnader
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Miltal
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Rullmotstånd
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Pris/värde
Continental EcoContact 6
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Dunlop Winter
84%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Lägga till i jämförelsen

Populära märken
Ny jämförelse

Dacktest.eu

Gratis — i App Store

HÄMTA

Dacktest.eu

Gratis — i App Store

Jämför däck, läs testresultat och hitta de bästa priserna — allt i en app.

Visa i App Store