6 butiker · 92 725+ produkter

Jämförelse: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Antal tester
18
10
14
6
4
Bästa placering
#1
#2
#8
#3
#2
Genomsnittlig placering
6.1
6.0
13.4
4.7
3.3
Senaste test
2024
2026
2026
2026
2026
Tillgängliga dimensioner
47
109
153
146
40

Dessa däck har inte testats tillsammans i samma test. poängen nedan är sammanställda från olika oberoende tester, varför direkt jämförelse bör tolkas med försiktighet.

Vått
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Vattenplaning - korsade
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Våtbromsning
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Vattenplaning - längsgående
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Våtförmåga
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Våtsvängning
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Torr
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Torrhantering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Torrbromsning
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Fältbyte i torrt väglag
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Ljudnivå utanför kupé
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kostnader
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rullmotstånd
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Miltal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Pris/värde
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Lägga till i jämförelsen

Populära märken
Ny jämförelse

Dacktest.eu

Gratis — i App Store

HÄMTA

Dacktest.eu

Gratis — i App Store

Jämför däck, läs testresultat och hitta de bästa priserna — allt i en app.

Visa i App Store