Jämförelse: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

övre-mellan

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

VS

e.Ziex

UltraGrip Performance 3

9.5

R14 – R22

Jämför även med

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Testprofil

WinterCraft WP52+

e.Ziex

UltraGrip Performance 3

Antal tester

3

24

Bästa placering

#4

#2

#1

Genomsnittlig placering

4.3

3.7

2.7

Senaste test

2025

Tillgängliga dimensioner

97

34

302

Vått

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Vattenplaning - längsgående

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Våtbromsning

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Våtsvängning

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

86%

Våtförmåga

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

91%

Vattenplaning - korsade

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Vätprestanda

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Snö

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Snöbromsning

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

77%

Snökurvtagning

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Snöhantering

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

62%

Snötraktion

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Snöprestanda

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Kostnader

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

70%

Rullmotstånd

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Miltal

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Pris/värde

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

68%

Torr

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Torrbromsning

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

72%

Torrhantering

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Torr prestanda

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Komfort

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

85%

Ljudnivå utanför kupé

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Komfort

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

73%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Jämförelse: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

WinterCraft WP52+

e.Ziex

UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofil

Vått

Snö

Kostnader

Torr

Komfort

Dimensioner och priser

Lägg till i jämförelsen