6 butiker · 92 725+ produkter

Jämförelse: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofil

Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Antal tester
4
18
4
29
14
Bästa placering
#3
#1
#2
#1
#1
Genomsnittlig placering
12.0
6.1
3.3
3.7
3.6
Senaste test
2025
2024
2026
2025
2025
Tillgängliga dimensioner
111
47
40
180
194

Vått

Vått
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Våtbromsning
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Vattenplaning - korsade
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Vattenplaning - längsgående
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Våtförmåga
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Våtsvängning
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Våt sido guide
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%

Torr

Torr
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Torrbromsning
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Torrhantering
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Fältbyte i torrt väglag
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Styrrespons i torrt väglag
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Ljudnivå utanför kupé
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%

Kostnader

Kostnader
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rullmotstånd
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Miltal
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Lägga till i jämförelsen

Populära märken
Ny jämförelse