6 butiker · 92 725+ produkter

Jämförelse: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Continental
EcoContact 6
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Antal tester
5
18
14
4
1
Bästa placering
#7
#1
#1
#2
#1
Genomsnittlig placering
13.0
6.1
3.6
3.3
1.0
Senaste test
2022
2024
2025
2026
2025
Tillgängliga dimensioner
680
47
194
40
66

Vått

Vått
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Våtbromsning
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Våtsvängning
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Våtförmåga
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Vattenplaning - korsade
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Vattenplaning - längsgående
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Våtprestanda
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Torr

Torr
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Torrbromsning
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Torrhantering
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Torrprestanda
Continental EcoContact 6
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Fältbyte i torrt väglag
Continental EcoContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Komfort

Komfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ljudnivå utanför kupé
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Ljudnivå i kupé
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Komfort
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Kostnader

Kostnader
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Miltal
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Rullmotstånd
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Pris/värde
Continental EcoContact 6
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Lägga till i jämförelsen

Populära märken
Ny jämförelse