6 butiker · 92 725+ produkter

Jämförelse: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Antal tester
6
18
5
4
28
Bästa placering
#3
#1
#1
#2
#1
Genomsnittlig placering
4.7
6.1
2.8
3.3
2.3
Senaste test
2026
2024
2026
2026
2026
Tillgängliga dimensioner
146
47
139
40
68

Dessa däck har inte testats tillsammans i samma test. poängen nedan är sammanställda från olika oberoende tester, varför direkt jämförelse bör tolkas med försiktighet.

Vått
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Våtförmåga
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Vattenplaning - korsade
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Vattenplaning - längsgående
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Våtbromsning
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Våtsvängning
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Torr
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Torrbromsning
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Torrhantering
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Fältbyte i torrt väglag
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Kostnader
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rullmotstånd
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Pris/värde
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Miltal
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Ljudnivå utanför kupé
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Lägga till i jämförelsen

Populära märken
Ny jämförelse

Dacktest.eu

Gratis — i App Store

HÄMTA

Dacktest.eu

Gratis — i App Store

Jämför däck, läs testresultat och hitta de bästa priserna — allt i en app.

Visa i App Store