Jämförelse: Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

övre-mellan

Kleber

KRISALP HP3

VS

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

KRISALP HP3

G-FORCE WINTER 2

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance 3

Antal tester

28

23

3

24

Best position

#2

#1

#4

#1

Average position

8.0

6.7

4.3

2.7

Senaste test

2025

Tillgängliga dimensioner

115

107

97

302

Prestandajämförelse

Vätprestanda

72%

Kleber

KRISALP HP3

69%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

79%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

90%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

Våtbromsning

Kleber KRISALP HP3

59%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

59%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

92%

Våtförmåga

Kleber KRISALP HP3

67%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

59%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

92%

Våtsvängning

Kleber KRISALP HP3

63%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

55%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

96%

Akvaplaning längs

Kleber KRISALP HP3

90%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

90%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

Akvaplaning tvärs

Kleber KRISALP HP3

82%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

91%

Torr prestanda

57%

Kleber

KRISALP HP3

69%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

Torrbromsning

Kleber KRISALP HP3

57%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

73%

Torrhantering

Kleber KRISALP HP3

56%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

64%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

64%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

64%

Snöprestanda

94%

Kleber

KRISALP HP3

96%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

83%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

Snöbromsning

Kleber KRISALP HP3

96%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

96%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

69%

Snötraktion

Kleber KRISALP HP3

96%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

96%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

69%

Snöhantering

Kleber KRISALP HP3

88%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

96%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

96%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Snö cirkelkurvtagning

Kleber KRISALP HP3

96%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

96%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

71%

Komfort & ljudnivå

60%

Kleber

KRISALP HP3

69%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

74%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

Ljudnivå exteriör

Kleber KRISALP HP3

60%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

78%

Körkomfort

Kleber KRISALP HP3

60%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

78%

Ekonomi

62%

Kleber

KRISALP HP3

67%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

Rullmotstånd

Kleber KRISALP HP3

73%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

65%

Miltal

Kleber KRISALP HP3

51%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

60%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

96%

Tester använda i jämförelsen

Organisation	Säsong	År	Dimension
Autobild	Vinter	2025	225/40 R18	Visa

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Visa övergripande jämförelse

Jämförelse: Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

KRISALP HP3

G-FORCE WINTER 2

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

Prestandajämförelse

Tester använda i jämförelsen

Dimensioner och priser

Lägg till i jämförelsen