6 butiker · 92 725+ produkter
DACKTEST.EU

Jämförelse: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Kumho Ecsta HS52övre-mellan
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
GT RADIAL ClimateActiveBudget
GTGT

RADIAL ClimateActive

8.3
R15 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Falken e.Ziexövre-mellan
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Jämför även med
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Antal tester
10
3
4
3
Bästa placering
#2
#5
#2
#2
Genomsnittlig placering
6.0
7.3
3.3
3.7
Senaste test
2026
2025
2026
2025
Tillgängliga dimensioner
109
59
40
36

Vått

Vått
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Vattenplaning - korsade
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Vattenplaning - längsgående
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Våtbromsning
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Våtsvängning
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Våtförmåga
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Komfort

Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ljudnivå utanför kupé
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Torr

Torr
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Torrbromsning
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Torrhantering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Kostnader

Kostnader
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rullmotstånd
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Miltal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Utforska rankingar

Däck för ev-bilarBästa däcken för torrt väglagen Bästa regndäcken under Däck med bästa vägförmåga från Mest tysta däck under Mest ekonomiska däcken för Bästa anti-vattenplaning däck under

Populära däckjämförelser

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Jämför även

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kumho Ecsta HS51Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageKumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNGT RADIAL ClimateActive vs Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Bläddra efter märke

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Lägga till i jämförelsen

Populära märken
Ny jämförelse