6 butiker · 92 725+ produkter

Jämförelse: Viking Fourtech vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Dunlop
Winter
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Antal tester
5
4
2
17
23
Bästa placering
#11
#2
#1
#1
#1
Genomsnittlig placering
17.0
3.3
1.5
1.7
3.3
Senaste test
2021
2026
2025
2025
2025
Tillgängliga dimensioner
32
40
66
80
176
Vått
Viking Fourtech
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Våtsvängning
Viking Fourtech
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Våtförmåga
Viking Fourtech
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Vattenplaning - korsade
Viking Fourtech
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Vattenplaning - längsgående
Viking Fourtech
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Våtbromsning
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Snö
Viking Fourtech
71%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Snöbromsning
Viking Fourtech
82%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Snökurvtagning
Viking Fourtech
67%
Dunlop Winter
96%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
88%
Snöhantering
Viking Fourtech
71%
Dunlop Winter
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Snötraktion
Viking Fourtech
51%
Dunlop Winter
96%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Kostnader
Viking Fourtech
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Miltal
Viking Fourtech
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Pris/värde
Viking Fourtech
77%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Rullmotstånd
Viking Fourtech
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Ljudnivå utanför kupé
Viking Fourtech
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Torr
Viking Fourtech
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Torrbromsning
Viking Fourtech
47%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Torrhantering
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Lägga till i jämförelsen

Populära märken
Ny jämförelse

Dacktest.eu

Gratis — i App Store

HÄMTA

Dacktest.eu

Gratis — i App Store

Jämför däck, läs testresultat och hitta de bästa priserna — allt i en app.

Visa i App Store