6 butiker · 92 725+ produkter

Jämförelse: Viking Fourtech vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental SportContact 7

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
SportContact 7
Antal tester
5
4
23
3
16
Bästa placering
#11
#2
#1
#2
#1
Genomsnittlig placering
17.0
3.3
3.3
3.7
1.2
Senaste test
2021
2026
2025
2025
2026
Tillgängliga dimensioner
32
40
176
36
124

Dessa däck har inte testats tillsammans i samma test. poängen nedan är sammanställda från olika oberoende tester, varför direkt jämförelse bör tolkas med försiktighet.

Vått
Viking Fourtech
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Vattenplaning - korsade
Viking Fourtech
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
Vattenplaning - längsgående
Viking Fourtech
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Våtbromsning
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
Våtsvängning
Viking Fourtech
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental SportContact 7
87%
Våtförmåga
Viking Fourtech
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental SportContact 7
89%
Snö
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Snökurvtagning
Viking Fourtech
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
88%
Snöhantering
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Snötraktion
Viking Fourtech
51%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Snöbromsning
Viking Fourtech
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Kostnader
Viking Fourtech
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental SportContact 7
77%
Rullmotstånd
Viking Fourtech
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental SportContact 7
77%
Miltal
Viking Fourtech
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
78%
Ljudnivå utanför kupé
Viking Fourtech
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
75%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Continental SportContact 7
70%
Torr
Viking Fourtech
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
Torrbromsning
Viking Fourtech
47%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental SportContact 7
96%
Torrhantering
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental SportContact 7
94%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Lägga till i jämförelsen

Populära märken
Ny jämförelse

Dacktest.eu

Gratis — i App Store

HÄMTA

Dacktest.eu

Gratis — i App Store

Jämför däck, läs testresultat och hitta de bästa priserna — allt i en app.

Visa i App Store