6 butiker · 92 725+ produkter

Jämförelse: Viking Fourtech vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Antal tester
5
4
24
5
28
Bästa placering
#11
#2
#1
#1
#1
Genomsnittlig placering
17.0
3.3
2.7
2.8
2.3
Senaste test
2021
2026
2025
2026
2026
Tillgängliga dimensioner
32
40
302
139
68

Dessa däck har inte testats tillsammans i samma test. poängen nedan är sammanställda från olika oberoende tester, varför direkt jämförelse bör tolkas med försiktighet.

Vått
Viking Fourtech
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Våtsvängning
Viking Fourtech
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Våtförmåga
Viking Fourtech
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Vattenplaning - korsade
Viking Fourtech
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Vattenplaning - längsgående
Viking Fourtech
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Våtbromsning
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Snö
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Snöbromsning
Viking Fourtech
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%
Snökurvtagning
Viking Fourtech
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Snöhantering
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
61%
Snötraktion
Viking Fourtech
51%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Kostnader
Viking Fourtech
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rullmotstånd
Viking Fourtech
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Miltal
Viking Fourtech
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Pris/värde
Viking Fourtech
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Torr
Viking Fourtech
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Torrhantering
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Torrbromsning
Viking Fourtech
47%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Ljudnivå utanför kupé
Viking Fourtech
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Lägga till i jämförelsen

Populära märken
Ny jämförelse

Dacktest.eu

Gratis — i App Store

HÄMTA

Dacktest.eu

Gratis — i App Store

Jämför däck, läs testresultat och hitta de bästa priserna — allt i en app.

Visa i App Store