6 butiker · 92 725+ produkter

Jämförelse: Viking Fourtech vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Antal tester
5
4
1
24
28
Bästa placering
#11
#2
#1
#1
#1
Genomsnittlig placering
17.0
3.3
1.0
2.7
2.3
Senaste test
2021
2026
2025
2025
2026
Tillgängliga dimensioner
32
40
66
302
67

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Vått
Viking Fourtech
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Våtbromsning
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Våtsvängning
Viking Fourtech
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Våtförmåga
Viking Fourtech
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Vattenplaning - korsade
Viking Fourtech
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Vattenplaning - längsgående
Viking Fourtech
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Snö
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Snöbromsning
Viking Fourtech
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%
Snökurvtagning
Viking Fourtech
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Snöhantering
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
61%
Snötraktion
Viking Fourtech
51%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Kostnader
Viking Fourtech
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rullmotstånd
Viking Fourtech
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Miltal
Viking Fourtech
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Pris/värde
Viking Fourtech
77%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Ljudnivå utanför kupé
Viking Fourtech
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Torr
Viking Fourtech
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Torrbromsning
Viking Fourtech
47%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Torrhantering
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%

Dimensioner och priser

Jämför priser över alla tillgängliga dimensioner för dessa däck.

Lägga till i jämförelsen

Populära märken
Ny jämförelse

Dacktest.eu

Gratis — i App Store

HÄMTA

Dacktest.eu

Gratis — i App Store

Jämför däck, läs testresultat och hitta de bästa priserna — allt i en app.

Visa i App Store