6 butiker, 99 947 produkter

Jämförelse: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Innehåll:

Sammanfattning
Vått
Torr
Snö
Is
Kostnader
ömsesidiga provningar
Köp %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 P /93%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 /99%	Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ /87%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%

Dimensioner	R14 - R21	R14 - R22	R16 - R22	R14 - R18	R0 - R21	R14 - R19
Pris	Ange dimension för att se priser	Ange dimension för att se priser	Ange dimension för att se priser	Ange dimension för att se priser	Ange dimension för att se priser	Ange dimension för att se priser
Ta bort	Ta bort från jämförelsen	Ta bort från jämförelsen	Ta bort från jämförelsen	Ta bort från jämförelsen	Ta bort från jämförelsen	Ta bort från jämförelsen

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Premium

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ övre-mellan

6. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 övre-mellan

Antal tillgängliga storlekar

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 97

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80

Antal provningar

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 17x

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 3x

Bästa läge i testet

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.

Sämsta placering i testet

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 5.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 8.

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

Genomsnittlig position i testerna

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.71

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.33

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

året för det senaste testet

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 2025

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2024

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Bästa betyg i testet

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Testvinnare

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Väldigt bra

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Väldigt bra

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Väldigt bra

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Bra

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Bra

Sämsta betyg i testet

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Bra

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Bra

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Bra

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Bra

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Bra

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rekommenderade med villkor

Vått

(övergripande betyg)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

89%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

88%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Våtförmåga

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 92%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 82%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

6. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Vattenplaning - korsade

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 78%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 66%

Vattenplaning - längsgående

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 87%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

Våtbromsning

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 76%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 62%

Våtsvängning

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 90%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 81%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 67%

6. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Våtbromsning enligt eu-märkning

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 B

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ B

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

6. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Torr

(övergripande betyg)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

86%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

83%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

82%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Torrbromsning

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

6. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

Torrbromsegenskaper

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 78%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Torrhantering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 87%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

6. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Torrprestanda

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 78%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 59%

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

Snö

(övergripande betyg)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

89%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

78%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

77%

Snötraktion

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 76%

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 75%

Snöbromsning

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 80%

Snöhantering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 72%

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 65%

Kostnader

(övergripande betyg)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

75%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

74%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

59%

Pris/värde

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 70%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 68%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 49%

Rullmotstånd

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 92%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 89%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

Miltal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 83%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 76%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 37%

Bränsleförbrukning enligt eu-märkning

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ C

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

6. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Komfort

(övergripande betyg)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

92%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

81%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

54%

Ljudnivå utanför kupé

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 81%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 75%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

Ljudnivå i kupé

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 98%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 80%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 33%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Buller utifrån enligt eu-märkning

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ ?

Is

(övergripande betyg)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

85%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

0%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

0%

Bromsning på is

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P -27%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Lägg till i jämförelsen

Gör

Modell

Jämförelse: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Lägg till i jämförelsen

Lägg till i jämförelsen

Summer

Rangordning

Tester

Märken

Rangordning

Tester

Märken

Vinter

Rangordning

Tester

Märken

Rangordning

Tester

Märken

Allround

Rangordning

Tester

Märken

Rangordning

Tester

Märken