Jämförelse: Matador MP93 Nordicca vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Michelin ALPIN 6 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Premium

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 övre-mellan

3. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lågkostnad

4. Barum Polaris 5 Lågkostnad

1. Matador MP93 Nordicca 92

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

3. Michelin ALPIN 6 76

4. Barum Polaris 5 76

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 31x

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

3. Barum Polaris 5 13x

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca 4x

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 1.

3. Barum Polaris 5 9.

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca 11.

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 13.

3. Barum Polaris 5 26.

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca 38.

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 4.35

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

3. Barum Polaris 5 15.15

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Matador MP93 Nordicca 2025

3. Michelin ALPIN 6 2024

4. Barum Polaris 5 2023

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Exemplariska

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Väldigt bra

3. Barum Polaris 5 Bra

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca Nöjdhet

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Bra

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Bra

3. Matador MP93 Nordicca Nöjdhet

4. Barum Polaris 5 Tillräckligt

Michelin
ALPIN 6

81.2%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70.3%

Barum
Polaris 5

61.8%

Matador
MP93 Nordicca

38.7%

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 B

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

3. Barum Polaris 5 C

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca C

Michelin
ALPIN 6

83.5%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71.8%

Barum
Polaris 5

70.5%

Matador
MP93 Nordicca

56%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93.2%

Michelin
ALPIN 6

81.9%

Barum
Polaris 5

76.1%

Matador
MP93 Nordicca

48.7%

Michelin
ALPIN 6

85.7%

Barum
Polaris 5

82%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Matador
MP93 Nordicca

30%

Michelin
ALPIN 6

80%

Barum
Polaris 5

79.8%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Matador
MP93 Nordicca

0%

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 C

2. Matador MP93 Nordicca D

3. Barum Polaris 5 E

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E