5 butiker, 92 725 produkter

Jämförelse: Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Innehåll:

Sammanfattning
Vått
Torr
Snö
Is
Kostnader
ömsesidiga provningar
Köp %

#	Michelin Alpin 5 /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 P /93%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 /99%

Dimensioner	R15 - R21	R14 - R22	R16 - R22	R14 - R18
Pris	Ange dimension för att se priser	Ange dimension för att se priser	Ange dimension för att se priser	Ange dimension för att se priser
Ta bort	Ta bort från jämförelsen	Ta bort från jämförelsen	Ta bort från jämförelsen	Ta bort från jämförelsen

Segment

1. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Premium

Antal tillgängliga storlekar

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

3. Michelin Alpin 5 91

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80

Antal provningar

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 17x

4. Michelin Alpin 5 17x

Bästa läge i testet

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

4. Michelin Alpin 5 2.

Sämsta placering i testet

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 8.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

4. Michelin Alpin 5 17.

Genomsnittlig position i testerna

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.71

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

4. Michelin Alpin 5 5.88

året för det senaste testet

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2024

4. Michelin Alpin 5 2018

Bästa betyg i testet

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Testvinnare

2. Michelin Alpin 5 Väldigt bra

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Väldigt bra

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Väldigt bra

Sämsta betyg i testet

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Bra

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Bra

3. Michelin Alpin 5 Rekommenderade

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rekommenderade med villkor

Vått

(övergripande betyg)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

92%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

89%

Michelin
Alpin 5

79%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

78%

Våtförmåga

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 92%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 82%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 76%

Vattenplaning - korsade

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 83%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 78%

Vattenplaning - längsgående

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Michelin Alpin 5 87%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

Våtbromsning

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 76%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 74%

Våtsvängning

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 90%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 77%

Våtprestanda

1. Michelin Alpin 5 79%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 77%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 0%

Våtbromsning enligt eu-märkning

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Michelin Alpin 5 B

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 B

Torr

(övergripande betyg)

Michelin
Alpin 5

86%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

86%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

83%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

78%

Torrprestanda

1. Michelin Alpin 5 86%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 59%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

Torrbromsning

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 80%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

Torrbromsegenskaper

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 91%

2. Michelin Alpin 5 89%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 78%

Torrhantering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 87%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 87%

Snö

(övergripande betyg)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

90%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

77%

Michelin
Alpin 5

69%

Snötraktion

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 75%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 68%

Snöhantering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. Michelin Alpin 5 71%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 72%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 65%

Snöprestanda

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 85%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

3. Michelin Alpin 5 59%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

Snöbromsning

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 76%

Snökurvtagning

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 81%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 71%

Kostnader

(övergripande betyg)

Michelin
Alpin 5

84%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

75%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

59%

Miltal

1. Michelin Alpin 5 96%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 83%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 37%

Bränsleeffektivitet

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. Michelin Alpin 5 75%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 0%

Pris/värde

1. Michelin Alpin 5 97%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 68%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 49%

Rullmotstånd

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 92%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 89%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 68%

Bränsleförbrukning enligt eu-märkning

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 C

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

4. Michelin Alpin 5 E

Komfort

(övergripande betyg)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

90%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

80%

Michelin
Alpin 5

72%

Ljudnivå utanför kupé

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 81%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 63%

Ljudnivå i kupé

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 98%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 80%

4. Michelin Alpin 5 67%

Komfort

1. Michelin Alpin 5 87%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

Buller utifrån enligt eu-märkning

1. Michelin Alpin 5 ?

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

Is

(övergripande betyg)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

85%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

Michelin
Alpin 5

79%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

0%

Sidledsstyrning på is

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

2. Michelin Alpin 5 78%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 0%

Bromsning på is

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

2. Michelin Alpin 5 81%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P -27%

Lägg till i jämförelsen

Gör

Modell

Jämförelse: Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Lägg till i jämförelsen

Lägg till i jämförelsen

Summer

Rangordning

Tester

Märken

Rangordning

Tester

Märken

Vinter

Rangordning

Tester

Märken

Rangordning

Tester

Märken

Allround

Rangordning

Tester

Märken

Rangordning

Tester

Märken