5 butiker, 92 725 produkter

Jämförelse: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Innehåll:

Sammanfattning
Vått
Torr
Snö
Is
Kostnader
ömsesidiga provningar
Köp %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 /95%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 /99%

Dimensioner	R14 - R21	R14 - R22	R14 - R18
Pris	Ange dimension för att se priser	Ange dimension för att se priser	Ange dimension för att se priser
Ta bort	Ta bort från jämförelsen	Ta bort från jämförelsen	Ta bort från jämförelsen

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Premium

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Premium

Antal tillgängliga storlekar

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 265

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80

Antal provningar

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 24x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 17x

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

Bästa läge i testet

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

Sämsta placering i testet

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 8.

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 9.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

Genomsnittlig position i testerna

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.71

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2.67

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

året för det senaste testet

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2024

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Bästa betyg i testet

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Testvinnare

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Väldigt bra

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Bra

Sämsta betyg i testet

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Bra

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Bra

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Rekommenderade

Vått

(övergripande betyg)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

88%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Våtförmåga

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 91%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 92%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

Vattenplaning - korsade

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

Vattenplaning - längsgående

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 87%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

Våtbromsning

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 62%

Våtsvängning

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 86%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 67%

Våtprestanda

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 81%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

Våtbromsning enligt eu-märkning

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 B

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 B

Torr

(övergripande betyg)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

86%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

83%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Torrbromsning

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 72%

Torrprestanda

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 56%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

Torrbromsegenskaper

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 100%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 78%

Torrhantering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 91%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

Snö

(övergripande betyg)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

89%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

73%

Snöbromsning

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 77%

Snöhantering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 62%

Snötraktion

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 79%

Kostnader

(övergripande betyg)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

66%

Pris/värde

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 70%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 68%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 68%

Rullmotstånd

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 75%

Miltal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 83%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 76%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 56%

Bränsleförbrukning enligt eu-märkning

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 C

Komfort

(övergripande betyg)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

92%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

54%

Ljudnivå utanför kupé

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 75%

Ljudnivå i kupé

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 98%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 84%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 33%

Buller utifrån enligt eu-märkning

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 ?

Is

(övergripande betyg)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

85%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

0%

Bromsning på is

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 -27%

Lägg till i jämförelsen

Gör

Modell

Jämförelse: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Lägg till i jämförelsen

Lägg till i jämförelsen

Summer

Rangordning

Tester

Märken

Rangordning

Tester

Märken

Vinter

Rangordning

Tester

Märken

Rangordning

Tester

Märken

Allround

Rangordning

Tester

Märken

Rangordning

Tester

Märken