6 butiker, 99 947 produkter

Jämförelse: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

Innehåll:

Sammanfattning
Vått
Torr
Kostnader
ömsesidiga provningar
Köp %

#	Continental PremiumContact 6 /76%	Firestone Roadhawk 2 /74%	Firestone Roadhawk /57%	General Tire Grabber GT Plus /43%	GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV /0%

Dimensioner	R15 - R22	R16 - R22	R15 - R21	R15 - R23	R16 - R22
Pris	Ange dimension för att se priser	Ange dimension för att se priser	Ange dimension för att se priser	Ange dimension för att se priser	Ange dimension för att se priser
Ta bort	Ta bort från jämförelsen	Ta bort från jämförelsen	Ta bort från jämförelsen	Ta bort från jämförelsen	Ta bort från jämförelsen

Segment

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 övre-mellan

3. Firestone Roadhawk övre-mellan

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Lågkostnad

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Antal tillgängliga storlekar

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 296

2. Firestone Roadhawk 161

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 136

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 123

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64

Antal provningar

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 36x

2. Firestone Roadhawk 21x

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 3x

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2x

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Bästa läge i testet

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 5.

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2.

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 1.

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Sämsta placering i testet

1. Firestone Roadhawk 31.

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 8.

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 6.

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Genomsnittlig position i testerna

1. Firestone Roadhawk 11.9

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 5.67

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 3.06

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

året för det senaste testet

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 2025

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 2023

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2023

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2023

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 2018

Bästa betyg i testet

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplariska

2. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplariska

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Högt rekommenderade

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Nöjdhet

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Sämsta betyg i testet

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Nöjdhet

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Nöjdhet

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 Rekommenderade

4. Firestone Roadhawk Rekommenderade med villkor

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Vått

(övergripande betyg)

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

85%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

83%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV

80%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

67%

Firestone
Roadhawk

66%

Vattenplaning - längsgående

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 95%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 87%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 79%

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 79%

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 68%

Våtbromsning

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 89%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 80%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 78%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 67%

Vattenplaning - korsade

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 88%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 72%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 71%

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 68%

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64%

Våtförmåga

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 88%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 89%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 74%

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 61%

Våtsvängning

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 86%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 84%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 78%

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 62%

Våt sido guide

1. Firestone Roadhawk 92%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 74%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 0%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Våtbromsning enligt eu-märkning

1. Firestone Roadhawk A

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 A

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 A

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus A

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV B

Torr

(övergripande betyg)

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV

89%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

88%

Firestone
Roadhawk

81%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

79%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

64%

Torrbromsning

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 92%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 92%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 83%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 81%

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 74%

Torrhantering

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 93%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 92%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 88%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 77%

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 53%

Torrbromsegenskaper

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 84%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 81%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 75%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Fältbyte i torrt väglag

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 95%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 93%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 0%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 0%

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Styrrespons i torrt väglag

1. Firestone Roadhawk 100%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 0%

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Komfort

(övergripande betyg)

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV

78%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

77%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

77%

Firestone
Roadhawk

70%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

63%

Ljudnivå utanför kupé

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 72%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 70%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 66%

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 62%

Komfort

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 100%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 72%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 71%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 60%

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 0%

Ljudnivå i kupé

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 86%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 80%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 77%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Buller utifrån enligt eu-märkning

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 ?

3. Firestone Roadhawk ?

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 ?

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus ?

Offroad

(övergripande betyg)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

76%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

74%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV

0%

Firestone
Roadhawk

0%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

0%

Kostnader

(övergripande betyg)

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

88%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

81%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV

78%

Firestone
Roadhawk

69%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

61%

Rullmotstånd

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 88%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 88%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 85%

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 75%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 74%

Miltal

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 85%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 70%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 64%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 38%

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Bränsleeffektivitet

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 83%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 77%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 78%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Pris/värde

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 81%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 60%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 61%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 0%

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 0%

Bränsleförbrukning enligt eu-märkning

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 B

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 C

3. Firestone Roadhawk C

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV C

5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus C

Lägg till i jämförelsen

Gör

Modell

Jämförelse: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

Lägg till i jämförelsen

Lägg till i jämförelsen

Summer

Rangordning

Tester

Märken

Rangordning

Tester

Märken

Vinter

Rangordning

Tester

Märken

Rangordning

Tester

Märken

Allround

Rangordning

Tester

Märken

Rangordning

Tester

Märken